PDA

View Full Version : ultragaff


lo-phat
04-22-2008, 09:32 PM
i haven't seen an oficial ultragaff thread yet so i'd like to make one


the actual quality of the deck is poor, on the cards were you breath on them and "wipe away the red" the red pert is much darker and blochier than normal, and the same go's with the "merman matrix" cards.


on the king of hearts wipe-away corner to 8 of clubs there is a squere around the mini-pip were the lones don't go.


e gives it 5 stars, i give it 3

and how do you use the carrot card?

Deamon
04-22-2008, 09:40 PM
I also don't like this deck. I prefer the old "Red gaff deck" with cards that you can really use !

A.C.E
04-22-2008, 09:47 PM
I really don't care for the ultra gaff either. I think the ultra gaff is just a little bit cheesy, and they should have just stuck witht he original gaff.

SpiritScout
04-22-2008, 09:53 PM
Ugh
I could write a page of reason why it sucks. I won't do that though.

Reasons why it sucks:
Too many duplicate cards
Poor Quality
Almost all the cards are useless. Carrot? Batteries? come on people.
3 DVD's x $30 each = 90 dollars + $10 shipping, 100 dollars.

No need to say any more.

lo-phat
04-22-2008, 10:01 PM
ya the carrot and battery cards dont work for us bacause DG & WH designed them with tricks in mind therefore making most of the cards useless without the dvd's, and wat's up with the cars like the 10 with part of a card on the back like a 2 or 3

magicollie
04-22-2008, 10:04 PM
:o if anyone is thinking about seeling there deck or some of the card pm me.

exelus
04-24-2008, 10:47 PM
You really shouldn't judge a deck until you've seen all of what its capable of. I bought the dvd and cards, so I know what what its like. I'm not saying that this deck is worth the money, because its not, but its not as bad as you say it is.

The carrot card is a psychological force. I don't like it, but it has a use.

The cards with part of a card on the backs are the coolest things ever. They're used for Graphical Link, which is one hell of an amazing trick.

Overall, I don't think the quality is that bad. Some of the moving angel cards are a bit blotchy, but the red-blue smears look just fine to me.

But overall, the biggest downer is that they included the dreaded "concept cards". Some of these are awesome, and I'm alreadying thinking up uses, like the large winged angels, but the double back with sand on the back? Useless. The two cards that are constructed with the corners in the center are equally useless.

Again, I'm not saying that its worth the $100, but its not really low quality.

zachthac
04-24-2008, 11:01 PM
I like the first gaff deck better